Delhi High Court Demands NTA Response on Grace Marks Petition in NEET (UG) 2024
The Delhi High Court has called upon the National Testing Agency (NTA) to respond to a petition challenging the awarding of grace marks in the NEET (UG) 2024 examination, which was conducted on May 5th. The petition, filed by 17-year-old Shreyanshi Thakur through her mother, has raised significant concerns regarding the fairness and transparency of the marking process.
Petition Details and Court Proceedings
Presided over by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma, the case focuses on an alleged discrepancy in Question Number 29 of Test Booklet Code R5. Thakur contends that the question contained two correct answers contrary to the given instructions, adversely impacting her score.
The petition argues that the NTA’s decision to award marks to all candidates who selected either of the correct answers unfairly benefits those who guessed or did not follow instructions. This practice, according to the petitioner, discriminates against candidates who adhered to the instructions and chose not to answer the question due to its ambiguity.
Arguments Presented in the Petition
The petition claims, “The Defendant’s published answers grant scores to all students who selected either of the alleged correct answers, thereby benefiting those who guessed or marked an answer they believed correct. This act is discriminatory towards candidates who followed instructions and did not answer Question Number 29, which had two correct answers.”
Further, the plea highlights the severe impact on candidates’ rankings, with differences potentially affecting ranks by approximately 20,000 or more. Thakur asserts that such discrepancies significantly hamper the prospects of a better future for affected candidates.
Relief Sought by the Petitioner
Thakur seeks a directive to award the same number of marks to all candidates who did not attempt the ambiguous question. Additionally, she requests the removal of specific parts of the NTA’s information bulletin that allegedly justify the arbitrary treatment of questions with multiple correct answers.
The petition also calls for the NTA to revise and republish the NEET (UG) 2024 results, ranks, and percentages based on the corrected marks.
Next Steps in the Legal Process
The High Court has granted the NTA’s advocate time to gather instructions and has scheduled the next hearing for Wednesday. The case, titled “Shreyanshi Thakur vs. National Testing Agency,” stands as a crucial test of the transparency and fairness in one of India’s most significant medical entrance examinations.
The outcome of this petition could have far-reaching implications for the evaluation process of competitive exams in India, emphasizing the need for clear guidelines and equitable treatment of all candidates.
Key Points to Note
- Issue: Alleged awarding of grace marks for a question with two correct answers in NEET (UG) 2024.
- Petitioner: 17-year-old Shreyanshi Thakur.
- Court: Delhi High Court, Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma presiding.
- Next Hearing: Scheduled for Wednesday.
- Impact: Potential revision of NEET (UG) 2024 results, affecting candidates’ ranks and future prospects.
The resolution of this case will be closely monitored by students, educators, and legal experts, as it addresses fundamental issues of fairness and transparency in the highly competitive landscape of entrance examinations in India.
Case Title: Shreyanshi Thakur v/s National Testing Agency
Latest Posts
West Bengal POCSO Case: How Justice Was Served for a 9-Year-Old Victim
How Did Justice Prevail in the West Bengal POCSO Case of a 9-Year-Old Victim? A Tragic Case That Shook West Bengal WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now The gruesome rape and murder of a 9-year-old girl in Jaynagar, West Bengal, led to the swift conviction and death penalty for the accused, Mustaqin Sardar. This landmark decision by the POCSO court highlights the urgency of addressing crimes against children and ensuring justice in India. Also Read: How Does Poverty Drive Child Marriage in India? A Legal
How Does Poverty Drive Child Marriage in India? A Legal and Social Perspective
How Does Poverty Drive Child Marriage in India? A Legal and Social Perspective Poverty, Cultural Norms, and the Law: A Deep Dive into Child Marriage in India WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now Child marriage has long been a contentious issue in India, where socio-economic challenges and deep-rooted cultural practices often clash with legal frameworks. A recent Bombay High Court ruling granting bail to a man accused of statutory rape has reignited debates surrounding the role of poverty in perpetuating underage marriages. This article examines the
S. 306 IPC I Does Refusal to Marry Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Indian Law? A Detailed Analysis
S. 306 IPC I Does Refusal to Marry Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Indian Law? A Detailed Analysis WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on a critical case addressing whether refusing to marry someone can amount to abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision sheds light on the legal nuances surrounding broken relationships and their consequences in criminal law. Also Read: What Are the Legal Challenges in HOD Appointments in Medical Colleges?
What Are the Legal Challenges in HOD Appointments in Medical Colleges?
What Are the Legal Challenges in HOD Appointments in Medical Colleges? WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now The appointment of Heads of Departments (HODs) in medical colleges has recently become a contentious issue, raising critical legal questions. Are these positions administrative or academic? Should seniority govern appointments, or do rotational policies offer better management solutions? These questions have sparked debates, culminating in a Supreme Court case that could reshape policies nationwide. In this article, we delve into the legal complexities, the regulatory framework, and the broader
AIBE : Supreme Court Seeks BCI Response on Petition Challenging Ban on Final-Year Law Students from Appearing in AIBE 2024
AIBE : Supreme Court Seeks BCI Response on Petition Challenging Ban on Final-Year Law Students from Appearing in AIBE 2024 WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now भारत के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने शुक्रवार (13 सितंबर) को बार काउंसिल ऑफ इंडिया (बीसीआई) के निर्णय के खिलाफ दायर एक याचिका पर बीसीआई से जवाब मांगा है, जिसमें अंतिम वर्ष के कानून छात्रों को ऑल इंडिया बार एग्जामिनेशन (AIBE) में शामिल होने से रोका गया है। मुख्य न्यायाधीश डीवाई चंद्रचूड़ की अध्यक्षता वाली पीठ, जिसमें न्यायमूर्ति जेबी पारदीवाला और मनोज
PMLA Act l Supreme Court to Examine Applicability of CrPC Provisions in PMLA Cases Regarding Disclosure of Documents to Accused
PMLA Act l Supreme Court to Examine Applicability of CrPC Provisions in PMLA Cases Regarding Disclosure of Documents to Accused WhatsApp Group Join Now Telegram Channel Join Now The Supreme Court of India is set to examine the applicability of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) provisions in cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), focusing on whether the prosecution is obligated to provide documents to the accused during the pre-trial stage. This crucial issue is under scrutiny by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka,